(Although I hope it will be Trump, simply because it would be more entertaining and he wouldn't destroy the country as fast as Hillary Clinton would.)
But regardless of who wins the presidency, Americans are more and more resembling early German civilian Nazis (as opposed to uniformed SS and the like) and Communists in their politics.
The reasons WHY Liberals/Leftists went for Clinton or Sanders and many right-wing Conservatives went for Trump are very disturbing.
And just for the record: I don’t think Trump is anything like Hitler or the original Communist leaders. Just because both Trump and Hitler emoted a lot during their speeches and interviews, and just because they both talked about “making [their particular country] great again!” doesn’t mean they are similar.
And while I do not support Trump (and acknowledge that Hillary is even worse), it’s clear that Trump’s history, attitudes, and personality are nothing like Hitler’s.
However, the reasons why the American PEOPLE love Trump or Clinton or Sanders are disturbingly similar to those of the Russian, Chinese, and German people.
The Germans, Russians and the Chinese and Trump-supporting Americans all saw/see Hitler and Communist leaders and Trump as someone who would:
- crush groups they feel are oppressing them—like Leftists and anti-American immigrants
- make them “great” or “superior”—“AGAIN.”
- fight for them
- “take care of” them
- stick it to the powers that be (whether that was a weak yet greedy government or monarchy, etc.)
- significantly improve their economic status
- save them
Regarding these two aspects, people like to fear-monger about Trump.
But again, the differences are superficial.
What’s disturbing is not Trump himself (who is NOT like Hitler), but his supporters. A huge part of his popularity is based on his seeming battle-charge against a feared group (or groups), his supporters ignoring his hypocrisy (Trump is NOT a Conservative), and the declared intent of making their country “great again!”
“Making America Great Again!” is Not an Intrinsic American Value
Since it's not an intrinsic American value, it’s disturbing that so many Americans support this idea.
If you go back to the American Constitution and the Founding Fathers, you see that they weren’t trying to be “great,” they were trying to be free.
Up until the 1920s, Americans focused on individual freedom and individual liberty to reach individual goals. Their understanding of freedom and liberty included quite a lot of personal responsibility, too. And regardless of political party affiliation, your average American would’ve better fit the definition of a Libertarian; being free and independent were American goals. No one looked to the government to take care of them. Americans hated taxes and were glad to bear the yoke of self-sufficiency in order to avoid taxation and other forms of government exploitation.
In fact, individual freedom and liberty and small government were the reasons why Americans severed themselves from England in the first place.
During the time in which “the sun never set on the British Empire,” Americans weren’t looking to compete with Britain for greatness and world-rule; they were focused on self-competition and making themselves and their lives the best they could be—however they defined that. And because society was basically moral up until the 1920s (things started changing around then, although it was so slow and gradual that people didn’t notice until the 1960s), people held more or less the same definition of “being the best you can be”: economic independence (if not wealth), a solid marriage with well-brought-up children, community service, honesty and decency and trustworthiness, patriotism, etc.
So it’s a problem that Conservatives are going for this idea of “making America great again!” so strongly.
Historically, such a goal leads to a very bad end.
Damsels in Distress Waiting for a Shining Knight?
And the fact that Conservatives are desperate for a “savior” is very bad, too. Communists and Nazis were desperate for this, too. Like many Americans today, early Communists and Nazis felt helpless and wanted someone to “save” them and “fight” for them.
And while it’s odd to think of Hitler as anti-Establishment, that’s how people saw him.
The Germans suffered horribly after WWI. The average citizen ended up on starvation rations imposed on them by other governments and their own. People turned to the black market to meet their most basic nutritional needs, but even that wasn’t enough.
After persisting through his initial bad first impression on the German people, they eventually viewed Hitler as a passionate, caring, courageous, bold savior who will restore their self-esteem and economic status—and that’s how Trump supporters view Trump, too.
And just how Trump supporters are willing to overlook Trump’s faults (which are huge compared to the average person, but miniscule compared to Hitler’s), Germans were also willing to overlook Hitler’s “minor” genocidal tendencies—which Hitler wrote about in his book, but barely mentioned in his speeches between 1930-1932.
"Pay No Attention to That Man Behind the Curtain!"
For example, Trump was promiscuous as a single man and adulterous as a married man—and his supporters (including his most religious pro-family supporters) don’t care. He isn’t a Conservative; he’s a Liberal. He’s obviously a Liberal, if you look at his past donations and statements (including recent past). Yet even his most conservative supporters don’t care.
Several accusations are coming forth against Trump regarding unwanted kissing and touching and observing. Is there any proof? I don’t think so. But I am inclined to believe the beauty pageant contestants claims of him giving them a kiss (instead of a handshake) upon meeting them or walking into their group dressing room. Why? Well, the guy owned the beauty pageant. What kind of guy do you think involves himself in that kind of thing? Such men are inclined to think they have dibs on the contestants, too. (Also, it can be confusing to some men why it’s perfectly acceptable to gawk at a girl wearing a bikini onstage for millions of viewers—and even rate her!—but not on his own while she’s clothed similarly in a group dressing room.)
And his supporters don’t care.
(Note: I’m not saying all people who vote for Trump fit the above description. No way. I have a lot of respect for people who realize what an untrustworthy immoral jerk he is, but vote for him anyway to prevent a Hillary Clinton takeover because they know she is even worse.)
We're Just Trying to Protect You!
Many people don’t realize that the Germans would not have supported Hitler if he had revealed outright his diabolical plans for the Jews.
In fact, at that time, there were parties with a stated anti-Polish platform (like the Centre Party), but none with an anti-Jewish platform (although anti-Jewish sentiments were sometimes voiced by individual delegates).
Surprisingly, people from that time recall mixed views.
Some remember being aware that the Nazi party was clearly anti-Jew, but some recall that wasn’t clear or it only seemed like a couple of people in the party fit that bill.
In fact, the son of a Jewish mother and a German father recalls his father voting for the Nazi party because his father honestly didn’t consider them anti-Jewish.
Hitler rarely mentioned the Jews in his speeches between 1930-32.
And official persecution didn't start right away.
Three months after he came to power, Hitler instituted a boycott of Jewish businesses on April 1, 1933—which ran out of steam in about a day and even during that day, was ignored by your average German (who continued to patronized Jewish businesses unless forcibly blocked by Nazi bullies) weren’t into it.
After that, Hitler introduced laws under the guise of benefiting and protecting “the people” in much the same way that Leftists discriminate against Israel out of so-called humanitarian considerations:
- Only Aryans could hold civil service positions (which gave much-needed jobs to the unemployed—those cliquish successful Jews could just manage on their own, ja?)
- Jewish enrollment in public schools was limited to ease the overcrowding of the “precious” German children
- Jewish journalists were banned at the same time all German newspapers either went under Nazi control or were shut down—for the good of the people, of course.
And all this was stretched out over months.
Furthermore, while he was targeting Jews, he also targeted non-Jewish trade union leaders and Communists and other political parties, sending political opponents to prison or concentration camps. In a purge later known as Night of the Long Knives, he even murdered members of his own organization—including the very supporters who brought him to power.
So while Jews faced gradual discrimination, it was mostly non-Jewish German citizens who were being sent to concentration camps or being murdered.
Sure, there was persecution against Jews here and there to be sure, mostly carried out by “extremists” and not the average “decent” German citizen.
Again, this is exactly the same as the current Leftist persecution of Israel—all carried out for the sake of the disadvantaged, misunderstood, cuddly little Jihadis.
But much of the general extreme persecution associated with the Nazis didn’t get underway until 1935 - or even 1938. Like the Leftist derogatory labels today ("Racist!" or "[Fill-in-the-blank]phobe!"), Nazi Germany first labeled its victims (mostly non-Jewish) as "social deviants" or as people considered engaged in "asocial behavior" or "habitual criminals." Just like the Left's choice of "racist" or "[fill-in-the-blank]phobe", the Nazis chose labels that already resonated negatively with the general public.
Then the Nazis labeled this persecution as "preventative detention" or "protective detention."
So outright Jew-discrimination was distasteful, even though Hitler’s book and his people clearly displayed Jew-hatred.
Sort of like the Democrat party, run by obviously Jew-(self)hating/Israel-hating people, but isn’t considered to be the party of hate that it actually is. The Democrat party is the one considered to "care" about people and act only according to humane interests.
Which brings us to Sanders and Hillary Clinton.
(Note: You’ll notice that much of what follows applies to Obama and his supporters, too, but I had to draw the line somewhere. ;)
Democrats, Leftists, Communists, and Nazis
You are probably well-aware that “Nazi” actually stands for National-SOCIALIST.
And Socialism, given enough time, will always lead to Communism.
But Liberals/Leftists/Democrats either aren’t aware or don’t care.
So let's go down the list of Nazi/Communist/American-Leftist commonalities:
Nazis and Communists Both Engaged in Pseudoscience.
Communism had Lysenkoism.
But Nazis really stole the pseudoscience show with their embrace of eugenics. Interestingly, the American Left has outdone even the Nazis with regard to pseudoscience:
- Global warming (which facts compelled them to reinvent it as “climate change”)
- Fetal biology (unborn babies are NOT “just a clump of cells/tissue”; the unborn baby does NOT go through an evolutionary process)
- Brain science (Okay, there IS real brain science, but there is also a lot of garbage about “teen brain” and depression and other mental illnesses as a “chemical imbalance” when much research points to other causes—and potential cures!—deriving from trauma, thoughts, attitudes, etc.) And there are spiritual causes, too.
- The benefits/uses/"truth" of "talk" therapy and child psychology
Reproductive System Obsession
Another thing is the wacky doublespeak the Left engages in, particularly with regard to women.
A huge part of Nazism and early Communism was its preoccupation with the female reproductive system. Both went through a strong phase of encouraging (and coercing) women (from DESIRABLE populations) to reproduce.
But for undesirable populations, the Nazi enforced sterilization, abortion, and infanticide.
The Nazis thankfully didn’t last long enough to then go into the phase the Communists entered regarding the imposition of birth control on the general population via government benefits and penalties—including, in China’s case, enforced abortion even at 8 months.
Leftist women love to scream about their “reproductive rights” using compelling arguments like, “Get your laws off my body!” and “Hands off my uterus!” and “You’re a man!”
And who can counter those kinds of fact-filled arguments? (Just kidding.)
At the same time, Leftist women demand that the government (i.e. the entire nation) is morally obligated to pay for AND support EVERYTHING to do with their reproductive system. They want birth, birth control, abortion, fertility treatments, paid maternity leave, paid paternity leave—government sponsored!
Some of the above is good and some is bad, but the point is that Leftist women want it ALL. Then they verbally eviscerate all dissenters and anyone who actually wants to leave them alone, i.e. take a “hands off” approach to the issue by NOT paying for all their reproductive (or anti-reproductive) whims.
Clinton and Sanders support all the above and their supporters love them for it.
The Nazi party strove to make children feel good about themselves. They developed numerous programs, especially for disadvantaged children, which brought fun, excitement, equality between class-standing, and gave children a sense of self-esteem.
In fact, interviews with former Hitler youth and girls show that they all expressed how the activities made them feel powerful and uplifted their self-esteem as children.
Clinton and Sanders promote programs for children under the same claims, which is a huge virtue in the eyes of their supporters.
Desirables vs Deplorables
Both Clinton and Sanders have their “pet” groups and their “ick” groups. They tend to like bad people (Communists, Sharia-enthusiasts, anti-Israel genocidists, etc.) while denigrating good people (like financially successful people—who succeeded via honesty and hard work, pro-family people, pro-Israel, etc.)
Communists also didn’t like financially successful people. Or certain kinds of doctors and scientists. Or Jews. Or believers in God. Or anyone who disagreed with them.
And I guess I don’t need to go into whom the Nazis liked and didn’t like!
Real Yet Temporary Benefits—i.e. Selling Their Soul to the Devil
What many people don’t realize is that at the beginning of Hitler’s reign, the average German’s life improved quite a lot:
- Improved factory regulations meant improved safety and hot meals for workers and obligatory work vacations.
- cheap holidays at large resorts
- a car (the Volkswagen bug, specifically)
- built the Autobahn
- built railroads
- hosted the Olympics
- provided seemingly wonderful children’s programs
- slashed unemployment for the average German
Likewise, Clinton and Sanders supporters consider all the Democrat social welfare programs to be “socially progressive” and some people have certainly benefited. But Clinton and Sanders’s social programs aren’t for the good of the people, but to advance their own agenda of power.
*BTW, regardless of who becomes President, it’s again very important to note that at the beginning of Hitler’s reign, things truly improved all around for the average German citizen. Not for Jews, nor Nazi opponents, nor ethnic or racial minorities, nor anyone considered deplorable by the Nazi elite. But for the average citizen who didn’t pay much attention to his or her moral compass, things were pretty good—for a couple of years.
Sanders and Clinton
Liberals/Democrats support Sanders and Hillary Clinton (and Nazis/Communists supported Hitler/Stalin/Mao) because they are sure that Sanders/Clinton/Hitler/Stalin/Mao would:
- Fight problematic groups (i.e. non-Leftists, people who think dismembering unborn babies is wrong, people who believe in God and the Torah, etc.)
- grant everyone the right to “education”
- promote ideas considered scientific by the average American, but actually fall under the category of “pseudo-science”
- fight for them
- “take care of” them—"them" being “the underdog” and “the little guy”
- stick it to the powers that be (whether that was a weak yet greedy government or an imperial monarchy, etc.)
- significantly improve their economic status
- save them
The thing is, Hillary Clinton is NOT the first choice for the majority of Democrats. It has come out that she and her powerful minions nabbed the nomination through manipulation.
And the fact that Democrats love Sanders so much is even more disturbing than the fact that so many Republicans love Trump.
Sanders is a hard-core Socialist. He even supported some very nasty things and nasty people AND he’s anti-Israel.
Please see Sultan Knish’s Bernie Sanders is Not a Jew (he means that colloquially, not halachically) for a very concise yet convincing write-up of Bernie Sanders’s heartless bigotry posing as “equality” and caring about “the people”—EXACTLY like the Communist leaders and Hitler impressed their own supporters, while committing or planning atrocities at the same time.
Sanders also strongly pushed for university education for all, yet another common denominator between him and Communists and Nazis. Schools, especially colleges, are great brainwashing camps. Communists and Nazis were VERY into “education” and formal schooling—THEIR definition, of course.
And while the Russians managed to produce some fine schools and professionals despite their Communist system, American schools have more in common with Nazi schools.
Nazi schools and universities were terrible brainwashing tanks for their government’s agenda (just like American schools), plus their universities claimed to provide a superior education for the Aryan “elite,” but in one case when Nazi German students meant students of the same age from France, the Nazi youth were dismayed to see that the French knowledge and skill was overtly stronger.
American universities are in exactly the same position. Oh sure, you can still get a wonderful education in law at, say, Harvard, but I’d steer clear of their psychology or education majors, for example.
For more, please see:
How Bernie Sanders Sold His Soul to the Left
Bernie Sanders and the Threat to the Left’s Aspirational Brand
Yet Democrats still love Sanders.
The above articles show you how deluded his supporters are.
In fact, it’s hard to even write about her because she is so heinous and repellent; I don’t want to really spend time on her.
Lies, Lies, and Wikileaks
Her lies regarding her emails and the national security she compromised is so well-known, I don’t even know where to link. Even the Left-leaning mainstream media covers it—albeit subjectively. Her emails also show enormous contempt and greed.
But that doesn’t deter her supporters.
"Heh-Heh-Heh; I'll Get You, My Pretty....Oops, I Mean, 'Peace, Man!' "
Her military stance is contradictory.
- On one hand, she seems to hate American military personnel.
- On the other hand, she worked hard to promote and support the wars with Iraq and Afghanistan, Yugoslavia and Kosovo, the bombing of Libya, and in 2008, she talked about “obliterating” Iran. (If it attacked Israel, which again, is like the Nazis using the caring, merciful excuse of protecting Germans to commit genocide. Her general policies and actions show her to be anti-Israel.) She also wants to get involved in Syria by enforcing a no-fly zone.
- Yet she engages in doveish rhetoric to her party.
Interestingly, this is what happened with many Germans after WWI.
Especially young former soldiers, they started maligning the military and showed overt disrespect toward military officers, no matter how impressive their rank. These types drifted toward Communism and its promise of equality for all. Yet all this disappointment and feeling of being exploited turned face and Germany eventually became one giant military machine.
So while Hillary propagandizes peace, her actions and other words show someone very different.
Yet all the Democrats (who still pine for Bernie) can say is, “I’m not crazy about Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy, but I’m still voting for her because…”
Sort of like, “I’m not crazy about Twinkies, but if there’s nothing else to eat…”
Like Hitler, Hillary wasn’t the majority pick for Democrats, although it was manipulated so carefully that it isn’t obvious. Top DNC officials worked against Sanders in favor of Hillary. (See DNC Leaks Show Hillary Clinton’s Rigged Game.)
Similarly, Hitler lost to Hindenburg in German elections, with Hindenburg later appointing Hitler chancellor under pressure from top politicians. On another election day almost 2 months later, Hitler still didn’t get the majority vote in Parliament (43.9%), although his party did win the largest number of seats.
I remember watching on TV the moment that Arafat declared that the Jews poisoned the wells of Palestinians. I watched in shock as she sat there nodding to every word, a giant smile plastered across her face as she listened to his words being translated via earphones. She didn’t frown nor look startled, nothing—she just continued grinning and nodding like Bozo the Clown.
Clinton’s real attitude toward Israel is laid out in the following:
Hillary Clinton’s Anti-Jewish Actions.
Hillary Clinton’s VP Pick, Tom Kaine, Has Anti-Israel Track Record
Hillary Clinton is Not a Friend of Israel
And this is all obviously okay with her supporters, including her supposedly pro-Israel supporters.
(Please see What is Pro-Israel? for an explanation of pro-Israel lip service sputtered by brainwashed or self-hating Jews and true pro-Israel ideology by true lovers of Am Yisrael and Eretz Yisrael.)
Top Brass in the War on Women
Hillary Clinton loves to blab about there being a "war on women" and how she is oh-so pro-woman, but her record clearly negates all this.
In fact, I do believe there is a war on women, but it’s propagated by the Left and Hillary Clinton is one of its chief officers:
- Hillary favors abortion, including late-term abortion, which is terrible for both mothers and babies. She doesn’t even stand against gender-selection abortions, a decision which usually means aborting a female baby simply because she’s female.
- She has always supported Planned Parenthood, despite their promotion of and carrying out of abortion, and despite the discovery of them organ-harvesting the babies, choosing abortion methods that best preserve the tiny body parts.
- Numerous women have come forth about Bill Clinton, either as willing partners in extramarital affairs or even worse, accusing him of molestation and assault. One of their secret service agents has gone on record as witness to numerous infidelities during Bill’s term as President.
- No self-respecting woman would ever put up with such a man (unless she was abused and couldn’t leave), but Hillary not only tolerates him, she enables and protects him.
Finally, there’s Hillary’s defense long ago of a 46-year-old man who assaulted and violated a 12-year-old girl into a coma. You can hear her laughing as she describes him passing the lie detector test. A lot has been made of her laughing about such a horrific act, but she’s clearly laughing about the fallibility of so-called lie detectors. And while she sounds crass in the recording, people often laugh while recalling disturbing events as a way of distancing themselves from the pain of the events.
What’s alarming in the recording is her certainty that the perp was guilty of his crime—and she defended him anyway. And like most sociopaths, she blames others: The judge “ordered” her to take the case.
Just following orders, eh? Hmm…now where have we heard that before?
But there was no law obligating her to take the case. She really didn’t have to. And a decent lawyer would not have done so.
Furthermore, she defended the perp by defaming and casting aspersions on the young girl, a method which is illegal now. True, it wasn’t then, but again, a decent person would not have taken that route.
And she’s never expressed any regret for any of this. She (and her supporters) persist in claiming she had no choice and didn't do anything illegal at that time.
Yet very normal people do act according to their principles, going above and beyond what’s legal.
- Ben Shapiro resigned his lucrative post at Breitbart in protest of their having become a Trump PR machine, the final straw being them turning their back on one of their reporters who was yanked out of the way by Trump’s campaign manager at a press conference. He didn’t hold onto his post at Breitbart while flapping his hands helplessly and crying, “Well, what can I do?”
- Samuel Adams, one of the signers of the US Declaration of Independence, opposed slavery. When a guest presented an 8-year-old black girl as gift, Adams and his wife accepted her—then freed her immediately, choosing to make her a member of their household instead. Slavery was legal at that time, but Samuel Adams chose to take the higher road and behave virtuously.
She obviously hates women and girls, yet the Left still continues to support and defend her. Again, this is so much like the Communists and Nazis who showed such loyalty toward their clearly misanthropic leaders.
For more information, please see:
5 Reasons Hillary Clinton isn’t Fit to be President
No Flies on Hillary
From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer
Well, this is it for now. There is a lot more dirt to dish on Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, but I’m feeling nauseated and depressed as is.
The point is, it doesn’t take much research to come up with these basics. Their supporters could easily do so, but choose not to. And when presented with the facts, they use pathetic strategies to deny the obvious truths.
Just like the Nazis and Communists.
And where are the Jews in all this?
That will be in Part II!
Part 1|Part 2|Part 3|Part 4|Part 5|Part 6|Part 7|Part 8|Part 9|Part 10|Part 11|Part 12|